Redirect Question, possibly custom rule

Hi there,

first day testing vBSEO i used the following thread rewrite rules:

boardunity.de/[thread_id]-[thread_title].html

second day i used the following thread rewrite rules:

boardunity.de/[thread_title]-t[thread_id].html

t[thread], f[forum], u[poll], ... to seperate the forumurlstructure from a upcoming blogurlstructure in the same directory

On the first day i get some nice rankings ... (take a look)

I want to redirect request for: boardunity.de/[thread_id]-[thread_title].html
to: boardunity.de/[thread_title]-t[thread_id].html

http://boardunity.de/3535-angepasste...der-vbseo.html should redirect to
http://boardunity.de/angepasste-disk...seo-t3535.html

The RewriteRule must be one of the following:
RewriteRule ^([0-9]+)-([a-zA-Z0-9-]+)\.html$ $2-t$1.html [R=301]
RewriteRule ^([0-9]+)-([a-zA-Z0-9-]+).html$ $2-t$1.html [R=301]

That 301rule cant be written directly into the custom rules so i put it into the .htaccess this way:

Code:

# Comment the following line (add '#' at the beginning)
# to disable mod_rewrite functions.
# Please note: you still need to disable the hack in
# the vBSEO control panel to stop url rewrites.
RewriteEngine On

# Some servers require the Rewritebase directive to be
# enabled (remove '#' at the beginning to activate)
# Please note: when enabled, you must include the path
# to your root vB folder (i.e. RewriteBase /forums)
# RewriteBase /

RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !admincp/
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !modcp/
RewriteRule ^(.*\.php) vbseo.php?vbseourl=$1&%{QUERY_STRING} [L]

RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteRule ^(archive/.*)$ vbseo.php?vbseourl=$1&%{QUERY_STRING} [L]

RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule ^([0-9]+)-([a-zA-Z0-9-]+)\.html$ $2-t$1.html [R=301]
RewriteRule ^(.+)$ vbseo.php?vbseourl=$1&%{QUERY_STRING} [L]

Any ideas how i can manage this? Thanks in advance!

Hi Jannefant,
just try to move the selected rule (in bold) to the top (right after commented "RewriteBase" directive) and it should work as expected, I believe.

@Jannefant:

Did the change Oleg suggested correct your issue?