Regarding the most recent exploit, it has been mentioned that if the Apache username was different than the FTP username, it wouldn't have been possible. However after dozens of posts on here and messages back and forth with staff, some of the answers I'm getting seem to be contradictory.
For example, in order to switch the Apache username to something different, that means 644 permissions won't be possible and instead, 755 would need to be used. Oleg confirmed doing that would indeed be less safe than 644. It seems like a no-win situation. So what are we to do?
Note for staff: Can you please re-open my other thread too? I have since heard from others that were struck by that exploit at the exact same time and the logs show the path of entry was the same as this weekend's exploit - it would be helpful having a place to talk about it instead of just automatically dismissing it as something completely unrelated. Yes, they are two different exploits, but those of us hit by both at once can't help but ask, after looking at the evidence, if exploit A made B possible.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote
