Google's Supplemental Index - What You Need To Know

Majora · #1 05-25-2007, 07:37 AM

Google's Supplemental Index - What You Need To Know

If you run an online website or business you have probably already heard about Google's Supplemental Index. You may have even heard it being referred to as Google's Gulag, Google's Digital Dungeon, or the moniker that seems to have stuck: Google Hell. Hate it or love it, webmasters are passionate about the big G. There's no argument on that point for one good reason: Google simply delivers the most search engine traffic on the web. For any webmaster with at least a few white SEO connected brain cells Google can supply 60% or more of their traffic. Therefore, suddenly getting the majority of your pages thrown into Google's Supplemental Index can result in a correlating drop in business. A few examples of this were reported in a recent Forbes article by Andy Greenberg entitled "Condemned To Google Hell". It recounts how two online jewelry businesses lost traffic and sales by having their pages falling into Google's Supplemental Index. They speculated on what had caused this to happen: duplicate content? buying links? Matt Cutts, Google's main spokesperson (some say pacifier) to worried webmasters everywhere, responded in his own blog: "Having urls in the supplemental results doesn't mean that you have some sort of penalty at all; the main determinant of whether a url is in our main web index or in the supplemental index is PageRank." However, regardless of what Google maintains, being in the supplemental results is not a good thing for any webmaster or business. Just the fact it's called a supplemental index means it's not as important as the main index. This index is seen as duplicate pages, less important or less trusted by Google, thus the lower PR. All semantics aside, webmasters should try to keep their important web pages out of this supplemental index.

Lately, despite webmasters' wishes, Google seems to be placing more emphasis on the Supplemental Index and putting more pages there. One can only guess, but it may have to do with improving their SERPs -- the more relevant Google's search results become, the higher quality their flagship product will achieve. Or it may just be an easier way of spidering and managing all those countless pages that exist on the web. Regardless, you do not want your pages in this Supplemental Index unless they are really unimportant pages and these can have the 'no follow' attributes in the robots txt file. However, you still need to check this supplemental index for your own pages.

Simple Way To Check Google's Supplemental Index

You can go to Google search and type in:
site:www.yoursite.com *** -sjpked

replacing 'yoursite' with your domain/site to see what pages are indexed in Google's Supplemental Index. If you see any important pages there you should check your whole linking structure of your site. Are these pages linked properly? Are they orphaned? Are they well positioned in your internal site architecture? If there are obvious interior linking problems with these pages, fix them. It is also a good idea to see what percentage of your pages are in this index.

How To Calculate Your Supplemental Index Ratio

You can get your percentage of Supplemental results by dividing the number of pages in the supplemental index by the total number of pages in the main index.

site:www.yoursite.com *** -sjpked
___________________________________

site:www.yoursite.com

This will give you a good indication of the overall health of your site. If you have too high a ratio or too many pages in the supplemental index you should fix your site's linking structure and remove duplicate pages. Make sure robots can crawl all of your pages or at least the ones you want them to crawl. If you do find your site or too many of your pages in Google's Digital Attic, simply try to increase the PageRank of those pages. This is the main remedy supplied by Matt Cutts: "The approach I'd recommend in that case is to use solid white-hat SEO to get high-quality links (e.g. editorially given by other sites on the basis of merit)."
In other words, raise your PageRank to get those pages out of the supplemental index. This has always been the basic key to getting traffic from Google. Quality content plus quality links equals quality traffic from Google. Likewise: QC + QL = No Supplemental Index It is always a good practice to keep on the good side of Google. No need to be paranoid, but you don't want to do anything to bring unwanted attention to your site, especially the kind of attention that get your pages thrown into Google Supplemental Index in the first place. Besides, you never know how long it will take to get your pages back out and into the main index where they truly belong. Rumor has it, that place takes forever to freeze over! By Titus Hoskins (c) 2007

Here are the results of vbseo.com: http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&cl...nG=Suche&meta=

Best regards,
Majora

dutchbb · #2 05-26-2007, 05:38 PM

I'm not doing very good, lost a lot of indexed pages to the supplemental: site - Google zoeken

I'm not sure what happened but I bet it has to do with the latest pr update, that screwed everything up anyway.

Interesting read though.

Dave Hybrid · #3 05-26-2007, 08:32 PM

Same here, i was doing very well.

Now most if not all my pages are in the supps and my referrals are down to nothing.

This too is since the last update.

Time to buy more links.

Future · #4 05-27-2007, 04:05 AM

site:www.yoursite.com *** -sjpked shows me 80600 results

site:www.yoursite.com shows 76000 results

how to fix or what is wrong

Dave Hybrid · #5 05-27-2007, 05:21 AM

Something is ONLY wrong if your traffic from Google is down, those commands are known to be inaccurate.

Future · #6 05-27-2007, 11:54 AM

yeah my traffic from google is gone.. I am nowhere on first few pages for queries I was ranking on top results

Juan Muriente · #7 05-27-2007, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Hybrid

Time to buy more links.

...............

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt Cutts

(e.g. editorially given by other sites on the basis of merit)."

I guess we'll have to find ways to make purchased links look "editorially given"

Dave Hybrid · #8 05-27-2007, 03:41 PM

Lol! :d

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Supplemental Index Woes	seodevman	General Discussion	1	06-05-2006 01:45 PM
Revelations from Matt Cutts: BigDaddy Update & Supplemental Index Refresh	Joe Ward	SEO Buzz	15	06-01-2006 01:32 AM
only able to view 1/3 of vbseo config area	mindhunter77	Troubleshooting	5	01-31-2006 05:46 PM

SEO

Google's Supplemental Index - What You Need To Know

Google's Supplemental Index - What You Need To Know

Similar Threads